AI Coding Rollout - A shared way for the team to use coding agents

A fixed setup for an engineering team that already uses coding agents, or is about to. Repo context files, agent skills, security boundaries, CI and eval gates, and training. We run this setup on our own engineering work.

One repo

Tell us which repo to start with

We read how you review and release, then price a fixed rollout for that repo. A wider rollout is a separate order.

The rollout - What we put in the repo

Files and gates your team keeps. Not a tool you rent from us.

  • Repo context files. How this repo is built, how a change is reviewed, and what the agent must not do.
  • Agent skills. Repeated tasks written down so the agent does them the way the team already does.
  • Security boundaries. What the agent may read, which tools it may call, and what stays out of the prompt.
  • CI and eval gates. Generated code meets the same checks as any other change. Where the change is an AI behavior, the golden set has to pass.
  • Team training. The people who review the code, on the setup they will own. We leave when the team can change it without us.

One repo, then the next if you want it

We start where the team already feels the mess. Usually one repo.

1. Read how you ship

Review, CI, secrets and what is allowed to leave the building. The price covers that repo, and you see it before we start.

2. Context, skills and boundaries

The files land in the repo. They follow your review, like any other change.

3. Gates, then the team

CI and eval gates, then training with the people who will live with it. Another repo is a later fixed-price order.

How we work - We run this ourselves

The rollout is the engineering setup we already use, written so another team can run it. The wider company uses agents in sales and recruiting, on our own portal.

  • Our engineering work. Repo context, skills and CI gates are how our own engineers work. We do not ask you to adopt a setup we do not use.
  • Sales and recruiting. Those teams have agents in the loop as well, with the same idea: permissions, a log, and a person when the step needs one.
  • Our portal. The company runs on our own portal. That is the operating picture the coding setup sits inside.

Standards the team can keep

Ad-hoc use of coding agents does not survive contact with review, secrets and onboarding.

You own the files
Context, skills and gates stay in your repo. We do not lock you to one vendor.
Security is part of the rollout
Boundaries are written down with the setup, not added after someone pastes a secret into a prompt.
Eval-native where it is AI behavior
A golden set and a CI gate ship with the rollout when the change under test is an AI behavior, not only a lint rule.

FAQ - Common questions

Short answers on scope and ownership.

Which coding tools do you set up?

The ones your team will actually use. The delivery is files and gates in your repo, so you are not locked to a vendor we picked.

Is this a license or a workshop?

Neither. It is engineering and training. You own the files. We do not leave you with a slide and a tool login.

What does it cost?

A fixed price before we start, for one repo. A wider rollout, more repos, or deeper gates are scoped separately, still at a fixed price.

How is this different from sending us a consultant?

A consultant on the consulting page joins your team and ships product work. This rollout leaves a setup the whole team uses. Teams often want both: someone in the team, and the standard written down.

What about secrets and customer data?

The boundary is part of the rollout: what the agent may read, what it may call, and what must never enter a prompt. Data stays in your environment.

Ready to talk?

Bring the repo and the review rules

We will say straight if you need a rollout, a person in the team, or both.

Let's talk about what you're building

The Aidoni team together outdoors in Gothenburg